Index Page 1
Feb. 1993 the shadow
Mr. David Blunkett M.P., looking at the myodil problem, made four
demands of the Government:
Below are documents relating to the 1994 UK
litigation (perverted justice).
with the NHS and Court Transcript Extract, 1994
Alexander Harris made a disgraceful agreement with the NHS before the
Litigation began in 1994 whereby Alexander Harris would not pursue the
NHS during the proceedings and in exchange for this the NHS would
co-operate fully with reference to providing all patient records and
Advice July 1995
Myodil litigation settlement advice document. This document was
dreadfully flawed towards claimants in assessing the amount of
compensation they should recieve.
Below are post litigation correspondence documents between Ursula
Coxhead, American Lawyers, British solicitors, Dr. Burton, and the
Legal Aid Board.
Coxhead's explanation of the flawed criteria for diagnosing
Adhesive Arachnoiditis used to assess sufferer's eligibility to proceed
with their litigation.
February 1995, post litigation correspondence letter from an American
lawyer to Ursula Coxhead covering various subjects including the
procurement of a video tape from Dr. Burton and the fact that Eastman
Kodak's patent for Iophendylate actually expired in the 1950's.
May 1995, correspondence from Dr.
Burton to Ursula Coxhead, critizing the flawed criteria used
for diagnosing Myodil induced Adhesive Arachnoiditis during the UK
litigation in 1994.
June 1995, correspondence from the
Legal Aid Board to Ursula Coxhead acknowledging being invited to the
educational conference and their view regarding the flawed criteria
used to diagnose Myodil induced Adhesive Arachnoiditis in the
June 1995 further correspondence
from the Legal Aid Board to Ursula Coxhead confirming a representative
from the Legal Aid Board would attend the educational conference.
correspondence from an American lawyer to Ursula's solicitor, in the
letter the American lawyer criticizes the medical profession for
continuing to use Myodil whilst knowing they were injuring people and
that they shoulder equal responsibility with Glaxo.
September 1995, contradictory
correspondence from the Legal Aid Board claiming Ursula Coxhead hadn't
given the Legal Aid Board sufficient notice with regard to the
educational conference on Myodil Induced Adhesive Arachnoiditis.
September 1995, correspondence from
the Legal Aid Board to Ursula Coxhead's solicitor, discussed in the
letter is the likely prohibitive cost of any new litigation, and how
the flawed criteria for diagnosing Adhesive Arachnoiditis during in the
litigation is not a matter for the Legal Aid Board to address.
November 1995, correspondence
from an American lawyer to Ursula Coxhead covering various subjects
such as how the drug producers never tested the product and how the
medical profession didn't properly warn patients of the risks.
November 1995, correspondence from the Medicines
Control Agency to Ursula Coxhead, in the letter the MCA says that the
medical profession should be allowed to experiment on people through
the use of unlicensed drugs.
correspondence from Dr. Burton to Ursula Coxhead's solicitor. Dr.
Burton again critises the criteria used by the Legal Aid board for diagnosing Myodil induced
the 1994 litigation.
March 1998, correspondence from
Ursula Coxhead's solicitor to Ursula Coxhead in which he describes how
Glaxo's solicitors pressured the Legal Aid board in to not granting
Legal Aid for any new litigation by saying it would be a waste of
1999, Parliamentary Ombudsman's Report on MCA Testing and Licensing
documentation relating to Myodil.
A committee member of the MAG attempted to obtain documents from
the MCA with regard to testing and licensing of Myodil. The MCA
refused to provide all documents, so a complaint was made to the
Parliamentary Ombudmsan, this is his report.
Speech given by Ursula Coxhead at the
inaugural meeting of the
Parliamentary All Party Myodil Action Group
from the Lord Warner June 2004 in which he denies granting any inquiry
from Ursula Coxhead to MAG members in response to Lord Warner's Letter
Searle to MPs
Burton's November 2011 letter
Letter written to Ursula Coxhead in which Dr. Burton states in all
cases Myodil caused toxic chemical meningitis, and then progressed
leading to the secondary condition diffuse Adhesive Arachnoiditis.